Addendum To “Enormous Nutshell”: Competing Selectors
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Follows up on
↳ Reactionary Philosophy In An Enormous, Planet-Sized Nutshell — Essay · Mar 2013
Summary
A belated addendum to Scott's reactionary-philosophy explainer, now that he 'gets the key insight': redefine RIGHT = policies selected by cultural evolution, LEFT = policies selected by the marketplace of ideas / memetic evolution (so fascism, communism, liberalism are all 'left'). The reactionary program is a variation-and-selection system (a patchwork of high-variance strong dictatorships / charter cities, per Henrich's Secret Of Our Success) to capture right answers that sound unconvincing. Scott lays out the honest case against (it's as hard as global revolution; international cultural evolution is slow and bloody at ~50M deaths/bit; exit-rights may fail as in Dubai; the 'right/left' and 'kings' branding was a self-sabotaging error) while conceding the frame haunts him as memetic selection accelerates (Trump). A clarifying political-theory synthesis.
Why this score
Quality 69 · Strong. Strong (69): a genuinely clarifying reframe of the left/right axis via competing selection mechanisms, with a fair-minded critique; held FIRM below Excellent as an addendum/sequence entry building on Henrich and his own earlier Nutshell piece.
Claude’s paradigm shift 54 · Moderate. Moderate (54): the cultural-vs-memetic-evolution definition of the political axis is a fresh, non-obvious synthesis, though drawing directly on Henrich and neoreactionary source material.
Real-world impact 3 · Moderate. Moderate (3): circulates in rationalist political-theory discussion; no institutional footprint.