Highlights From The Comments On Twelve Rules
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Follows up on
↳ Book Review: Twelve Rules For Life — Book review · Mar 2018
Summary
A Highlights-From-The-Comments companion to Scott's review of Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules — curated reader comments (Peterson's chaos-vs-order/'everyone-could-be-a-Nazi' philosophy, 'negative meaning,' 'living the cliches,' an AI-curiosity-learning tangent, the Lewis/Abolition-of-Man engagement) interspersed with substantial Scott replies. Scott's responses carry the generative content: the inspiration-vs-truth distinction ('inspiring things should be judged as art, not truth-value' / 'Politifact rates your symphony FALSE'), the meaning-as-caffeine take (a biological emotional problem distinct from the philosophical one), and the mistake-vs-conflict-theorist analysis of removing the under-developed from politics.
Why this score
Quality 64 · Strong. 64 — low Strong. Above a bare highlights post because Scott's interspersed replies (meaning-as-caffeine, inspiration-as-genre) are substantial and generative, but it remains fundamentally a comments-roundup dependent on the original 12 Rules review, and much of the content is others' comments.
Claude’s paradigm shift 48 · Moderate. 48 — Moderate. The novel content (inspiration-vs-truth, meaning-as-caffeine) is in Scott's replies; the frame is a comments companion.
Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. 1 — negligible. A comments-companion post; no material reach.