Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Somewhat Against Psychiatric Conditions As Domestication Failure

Quality
73
Strong
Claude Shift
52
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10

Summary

A careful critique-plus-steelman of Benitez-Burraco & Lattanzi's theory that autism is 'undomesticated' and schizophrenia 'hyperdomesticated' humans (built on Belyaev's fox-domestication / neural-crest 'domestication syndrome'). Scott dismantles the pattern-matching with specifics: the head-size claim shifts goalposts (autism judged on larger heads, schizophrenia on smaller brains); the 'hyperdomesticated = friendlier' prediction collapses because paranoid distrust is a core schizophrenia symptom; the spotted-fur / floppy-ear / HPA-axis links are super-rare diseases, mere asymmetry (mutational load), and nonspecific findings ('everything makes you feel bad'); and apes/Neanderthals aren't autistic, cows aren't schizophrenic. Then the constructive turn: Williams Syndrome — which BBL never mention — is a far better fit for 'hyperdomestication' (pathological niceness and trust, 'cocktail personality,' short noses, smaller teeth/brains), and the single gene most differentiated between dogs and wolves, WBSCR17, is named for Williams-Beuren Syndrome. So rather than 'undomesticated vs hyperdomesticated,' the better claim is that a subtle embryological trust/sociability system (oddly tied to ear/nose shape) is hit differently by autism, schizophrenia, and Williams — 'same system,' not same or opposite diseases. Take-home: study these conditions embryologically.

Why this score

Quality 73 · Strong. Strong (73). High-quality, well-researched intellectual work — rigorous debunking (the goalpost-shifting catch; 'everything makes you feel bad') paired with a genuinely illuminating constructive reframe (Williams Syndrome, the WBSCR17 detail, the trust/embryology system). Solid mid-Strong; not landmark, but a model of charitable-yet-skeptical analysis, and a welcome cat-2 entry.

Claude’s paradigm shift 52 · Moderate. Moderate (52). Synthesizes and critiques existing theories (BBL, Belyaev, the Williams literature, credited partly to Wade/a Reddit comment); the fresh contribution is the constructive Williams reframe rather than a new paradigm.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Minor (2). A thoughtful niche essay in the biology of psychiatric conditions; no policy or clinical-practice impact.