Practically-A-Book Review: Dying To Be Free
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Summary
A commentary on HuffPost's 'Dying To Be Free' — that suboxone (buprenorphine) is the heroin-addiction treatment that works but goes unused. Scott, who works at a suboxone-leading hospital, confirms it removes the biological half of addiction and beats traditional rehab (80-90% relapse), but is blocked by two enraging roadblocks: the government over-regulates it (per-doctor patient limits — the addiction TREATMENT is more tightly controlled than the addictive opioids it replaces), and the quasi-religious rehab industry bars it as 'just another drug' (the infuriating three-quarters-house anecdote — a drug-addiction facility refusing his patient for being on addiction medication). He draws out the recurring SSC themes: rehabs as a damning counterexample to the value-of-tight-communities story; his love-hate libertarianism (an unregulated rehab market produced charlatanry); and 'society is fixed, biology is mutable' — every social fix for addiction has failed, but saturating the brain receptor works.
Why this score
Quality 74 · Strong. A passionate, clinically-authoritative case for suboxone with a sharp dual critique of government over-regulation and rehab-industry fanaticism, and the strong 'society is fixed, biology is mutable' framing. Strong.
Claude’s paradigm shift 56 · Moderate. Marshals a known treatment-access argument with several characteristic SSC framings (the tight-community counterexample, society-is-fixed); fresh synthesis of borrowed material. Notable.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A within-discourse treatment-access argument; no material-world effect. Within-blog influence.