Misperceptions On Moloch
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Follows up on
↳ Meditations on Moloch — Essay · Jul 2014
Summary
A sharp Q&A addendum to Meditations On Moloch, answering four misperceptions: (1) 'human values = hedonism' -> preference utilitarianism already honors martial glory/mysticism/etc., and a friendly superintelligence would yield an Archipelago; (2) 'you can't conquer Gnon/physics' -> not literally, but you can do something that looks like it, the way rockets 'conquer' gravity, so don't worship the constraint; (3) 'progressive values are just Cthulhu/memetic drift' -> widely-believed is weak positive evidence, not disproof; (4) 'human values are just blind evolution' -> yes, and defending them anyway is The Gift We Give To Tomorrow. Valuable clarifications riding on a landmark.
Why this score
Quality 65 · Strong. Strong (65): crisp, valuable clarifications (the conquer-Gnon-like-gravity and brain-as-environment-where-true-memes-survive framings are memorable), but a short supplementary FAQ leaning on Moloch's ideas rather than a standalone contribution.
Claude’s paradigm shift 50 · Moderate. Moderate (50): some fresh framing (meme-fitness-is-host-relative, poetic 'conquering' of natural law), built directly on the Moloch/Gnon vocabulary.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Minor-plus (2): within-blog/niche; a Moloch-adjacent clarification with limited independent footprint.