Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Your Book Review: The Family That Couldn’t Sleep

Quality
79
Excellent
Claude Shift
58
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10
Humor level 2 badge: Man of One StudyHumorMan of One Studya lone chuckle

Summary

Anonymous 2024 book-review-contest finalist on D.T. Max's The Family That Couldn't Sleep, a history of prion diseases. Covers the four threads: the Venetian fatal-familial-insomnia family (the powerless-against-sleep curse, prion dementia that uncannily spares the self); kuru and the Fore (the recent-not-ancient cannibalism, the age-distribution clincher, and Carleton Gajdusek as a brilliant-monster -- a Nobel-winning field scientist who went to PNG partly to study disease and partly to molest children, which D.T. Max refuses to soften); scrapie and the impossibility of prions (proteins that can't be denatured, the genetic-infectious-sporadic triad that violated 20th-century biology; Prusiner as the peer-reviewer-from-hell who proved the protein-only hypothesis); and the BSE/vCJD epidemic (the 'cacklingly evil' British-government coverup, dying teenagers). The review's real value-add is 18 years of hindsight the 2006 book lacked: the reassuring M/M-genotype-immunity story was WRONG (M/V heterozygotes get vCJD; ~1 in 2000 Britons carry latent vCJD; sporadic-prion prevalence is ~1 in 5000, not 1 in a million -- Eric & Sonia Vallabh Minikel's work), the candidate-gene-era critique, chronic-wasting-disease's unnatural spread through deer farming, and the 'is Alzheimer's a prion disease?' / Pasteur's-flask-counterfactual coda.

Why this score

Quality 79 · Excellent. Excellent, top guest tier. A prion-disease tour-de-force -- vivid character-driven narrative, real scientific depth, AND genuinely important original work (the 18-years-later correction that overturns the book's reassuring conclusions and surfaces alarming current prevalence data), in an electric voice. Scored on merit just below the 80 single-paper forensic demolitions because it is broader and, by the reviewer's own admission, sprawling/skim-heavy.

Claude’s paradigm shift 58 · Moderate. Notable, high for a review. The history is D.T. Max's, but the hindsight-correction (M/V susceptibility, 1-in-5000 prevalence), the candidate-gene critique, and the Alzheimer's-as-prion / Pasteur's-flask synthesis are original, non-obvious contributions.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Minor. Surfaces genuinely public-health-relevant facts (latent-vCJD prevalence, blood-donation risk), but as a review its own reach is discourse-level. 2.

Humor 2/5 · Man of One Study. Notable intentional humor in a serious piece (=2). A sustained, deliberate gallows-comic voice with genuine comic set-pieces -- the PNG Lyttle-Lytton joke, 'so they gave it to the Australians', 'don't eat people', the exclamatory 'OH GOD OH FUCK' dramatic-irony beats -- a mentionable feature, the Commentariat/1587 tier; below primarily-comedic 3 since the spine is serious disease history. Flagged gate-pass judgment call.