Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Highlights From The Comments On Polyamory

Quality
68
Strong
Claude Shift
46
Moderate
RWI
2
of 10

Follows up on

You Don't Hate Polyamory, You Hate People Who Write Books — Essay · Feb 2024

Contra The Atlantic On Polyamory — Essay · Feb 2024

Summary

Rich companion to the two polyamory posts. The Aella/SSC-survey stats (poly and mono about equally happy; poly have ~half as many kids; the wishy-washy 'middle' is worst), the memorable per-protocol-vs-intention-to-treat framing for relationship structures, the cultural-selection-argument rebuttal, the desire-vs-jealousy restraint symmetry, the abuse-risk concern, and the (much-disagreed-upon) 'two types of poly people' discussion.

Why this score

Quality 68 · Strong. Top of the companion band: real analysis (esp. the per-protocol/ITT lens + the survey synthesis), held below both parents (ACX-553=69, ACX-554=71).

Claude’s paradigm shift 46 · Moderate. Notable: the per-protocol/ITT framing for social institutions.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Within-discourse companion; no material effect. =2.